The goals and functions of these have recently received considerable attention, both because of the influence that such histories have had on the legitimacy and self-image of the disciplines and also because of the adaptability that they have shown when faced with the conceptual and methodological changes that they have undergone. With regard to these disciplines, there are, moreover, alternative approaches whose advantages and disadvantages are also the subject of debate:
Oaks, Quorum of the 12 Apostles. Holy Ghost to personally authenticate the truthfulness of the origins and content of the Book of Mormon. Given constant encouragement from general and local leaders of reliance on supernatural manifestations a testimony over testable claims, it is not surprising that many faithful Latter-Day Saints seem unfazed by empirical evidence or the lack of it contradicting Book of Mormon claims, whether the research is conducted by Mormon or non-Mormon archaeologists and historians.
Of even greater concern is that many faithful LDS members, by virtue of the admonition of their leaders mentioned aboveare not even aware of the perplexing problems contained in the Book of Mormon text. As a result, they are usually unable to effectively dialogue with critics without resorting to faith-based claims in a testimony which carry no authoritative weight for the many dedicated experts in the fields of archaeology, history, linguistics, genetics, etc.
This page details some problems that arise by accepting the Church-sanctioned teachings of the origin and content of the BOM as well as responses to those problems from the LDS Church, apologists and devout members.
Count the clock," with Cassius replying, "The clock has stricken three. Shakespeare took something familiar to him, a clock that strikes the hours, and placed it in his story before such clocks existed. If, however, someone were to claim that they had found an ancient writing from 44 BC that had the play written on it, it would clearly be seen as a forgery because of the clock anachronism.
If it would require more than one anachronism for you to disbelieve, how many such anachronisms would be needed for you to realize the writing was not what it claimed to be?
For many apologists, if something is possible, no matter how implausible, that is enough to assuage their concerns. For critics, the idea is not what is possible, but what is probable.
What is the probability of a reference to a clock that strikes hours realistically appearing in a document from 44 BC? A "Julius Caesar" apologist would believe so much in the historicity of the "Julius Caesar" document that she would try any method possible to wave away the clock anachronism.
The critic would try to prove the clock was an anachronism, thereby proving its fraudulent provenance. The apologist may say that what the original document was referring to was simply a sundial, but the person translating it knew that it was some sort of timepiece and chose a timepiece they were familiar with, a clock.
The critic would point out that the phrase "count the clock" and the word "stricken" clearly refer to clocks that make noise and that in the particular scene in "Julius Caesar" it was 3: The apologist cannot leave it there, she must do whatever twisting and turning it takes to maintain her belief in the "truthfulness" of the document and its translation.
This will lead to ever more absurd explanations and possibly outright lies to protect her belief about the historicity of the document at all costs. It might be easy to brush off an anachronism or two, but how many anachronisms need to be found in the Book of Mormon for someone to say that the book was not what Joseph claimed it to be?
Not only does an increase in the frequency of anachronisms increase the probability that a work is not historically accurate, but the nature in which the anachronistic word is used can do so as well. In the clock example above, if "clock" were mentioned alone, it would be easier to pass off as some sort of translation error.
But when the idea within which the anachronistic word is embedded relies on a specific meaning for that word, such as the idea that the clock must "strike" and be used at night, then the probability of it being an actual anachronism instead of just a simple mistake increases.
Besides simply chronological anachronisms, the Book of Mormon contains items that might not be simply out of time, but they are geographically out of place for the time period the Book of Mormon covers. The Church teaches that the first inhabitants of the Americas were the Jaredites, arriving in the New World and beginning their historical records "approximately B.
This means that anything mentioned in the Book of Mormon takes place from approximately BC to approximately AD. An example of something in the correct time period for parts of the world, but out of place for the Americas is steel.
The same is true for many animals, such as horses, elephants, goats, donkeys, etc. Below are some of the contradictory and often anachronistic items in the Book of Mormon text.
Book of Mormon Animals Some of the anachronistic animals found in the Book of Mormon include horses, cattle, oxen, donkeys, goats, wild goats, sheep, swine and elephants see 1 Nephi Scientists say that the modern-day horse did not exist in the Americas during BOM times. It is universally accepted among mainstream archaeologists, anthropologists, and historians that there is no evidence of the existence of a pre-Columbian horse, excepting the long-extinct species.
The following is taken from wikipedia - Book of Mormon anachronisms as of May 20, Horses are mentioned fourteen times in the Book of Mormon, and are portrayed as an integral part of the cultures described. Horses evolved in North America, but became extinct at the end of the Pleistocene.Scientific Change.
How do scientific theories, concepts and methods change over time? Answers to this question have historical parts and philosophical parts. Book of Mormon Problems. LDS Church members are taught that the Book of Mormon (BOM) is scripture, as well as a true record of the inhabitants of the Americas from about BC to AD.
the history of science and the history of the scientific disciplines. goals and branching of a research program in the history of geography (*) horacio capel. Hard scientific evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.
Scientific Realism and Antirealism. Debates about scientific realism concern the extent to which we are entitled to hope or believe . the history of science and the history of the scientific disciplines. goals and branching of a research program in the history of geography (*) horacio capel. BibMe Free Bibliography & Citation Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard.
World Trade Center towers destroyed by controlled demolitions using Nano-thermite - investigate Thermate Superthermite Red Thermite chips found. The Scientific Revolution was a series of events that marked the emergence of modern science during the early modern period, when developments in mathematics, physics, astronomy, biology (including human anatomy) and chemistry transformed the views of society about nature.
The Scientific Revolution took place in Europe towards the end of the Renaissance period and continued through . Box and Cox () developed the transformation. Estimation of any Box-Cox parameters is by maximum likelihood.
Box and Cox () offered an example in which the data had the form of survival times but the underlying biological structure was of hazard rates, and the transformation identified this.